Featured Project: Handling Do Not Call Requests
Featured Project: Handling Do Not Call Requests
Project Overview
Role: Instructional Designer and Developer
Target Audience: Debt collections specialists
Tools Used: Articulate Storyline 360, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Audition, TechSmith SnagIt
Scope: 30-minute interactive compliance module.
To respect corporate data policy and create a short, streamlined experience, the interactive course example is a condensed version rather than the full enterprise deployment. Detailed account handing procedures and visuals have been removed to protect proprietary company data.
While the production course features the full two-path design described below, this example leaves only one path functional. This allows viewers to experience the instructional strategies used throughout the project without needing to complete the full 30-minute course.
A baseline audit of one hundred debt collection calls resulting in a Cease and Desist account status (anonymized in the artifact as “Do Not Call” status to protect proprietary business verbiage) revealed a critical threat to compliance and operational integrity. Debt collections specialists were consistently making two high-risk errors in account handling:
Collectors struggled to differentiate a request for a C&D from related yet distinct account restrictions, such as a wrong number, a restriction on calls to a work number, or a request for no contact outside of a specified time period. Because each of these requires different system workflows, misclassification can expose the company to costly litigation or unnecessarily cease communications on a viable account.
When an unverified party requested a C&D, collectors were routinely bypassing core security protocols. In addition to entering the C&D code for an unverified party in the contact center platform at the end of the call, they were also accessing the unverified customer’s account in the account records system and applying the C&D. By altering a customer’s records without verifying the identity of the person making the request, collectors were exposing the company to a massive compliance risk.
Because the course was designed for tenured collectors, extensive introductory information was unnecessary. I opened the course with an activation activity. Learners listened to excerpts from live customer interactions and identified whether each was a C&D request. This activity drew on their existing experience and set them up for the goals of the training. Learners often associate traditional “in this course, you will” slides with an unengaging learning experience, so rather than begin with a bullet-point list of learning objectives, I wove the objectives naturally into the narration of the activation activity.
The course then mapped out into two distinct self-paced paths based on customer verification status:
Verified Customer path: Focused on differentiating a C&D request from a verified customer from similar communication restriction requests (such as restricting communication types other than phone calls, restricting calls to a work number, or restricting calls to a specified days and/or times) and walking collectors through the steps for performing the necessary account maintenance.
Unverified Interaction path: Focused on differentiating between a C&D request from an unverified customer/unauthorized third-party and an indication or inference of a wrong number.
The course concluded with a practice exercise consisting of a mix of verified and unverified customer scenarios. Instead of a traditional knowledge check, I utilized an “answer until correct” strategy. In the case of an incorrect answer, the learner received immediate feedback and was unable to progress until they had answered correctly. In essence, learners were required to demonstrate mastery to complete the course. This served the dual purpose of ensuring learners mastered the material and respecting the time of both the learners and their managers. Learners were not required to complete the course multiple times, and managers were not required to manage re-enrollments and track course failures.
The immediate operational gap was addressed via a VILT refresher delivered by the training staff. Following the VILT, this module was commissioned to turn the temporary intervention into a permanent, scalable digital learning asset. By converting the identified compliance gaps into a self-paced eLearning course, the project delivered significant operational value:
Automated Remediation: Transforming the VILT into an eLearning course provided the company with a just-in-time remediation asset that could be used for individual collectors flagged as part of the QA team’s monthly call monitoring exercises or by managers and site leaders.
Onboarding: The module was integrated into the company’s training ecosystem as part of the training of new collectors, ensuring that collectors began their tenure with fully vetted instruction on company compliance standards
Standardization: Unlike an ILT where retention can vary by facilitator, this module’s built-in mastery gate guaranteed that every collector who completed it demonstrated 100% accuracy in handling C&D calls before entering or returning to the collections floor.